Legal Opinion

State v. Rambahal

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 19, 2008No. A07-512Published

1Opinion of the Court

751 N.W.2d 84 (2008)

STATE of Minnesota, Respondent,

v.

Johnny RAMBAHAL, Appellant.

No. A07-512.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

June 19, 2008.

David Lorin Warg, O'Connell, Wermager & Warg, Hastings, MN, Mark D. Nyvold, St. Paul, MN, for Appellant.

Thomas Earl Lockhart, Special Staff Assistant County Attorney, Hastings, MN, Attorney General—Criminal, St. Paul, MN, for Respondent.

Heard, considered, and decided by the court en banc.

OPINION

GILDEA, Justice.

Appellant Johnny Rambahal is charged with violating Minn.Stat. § 624.713, subd. 1(b) (2006), which prohibits him from possessing a pistol because of a…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Arizona v. ManypennySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. State v. MooreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  4. State v. Joon Kyu KimSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  5. State v. ScottSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API