Legal Opinion

Daniel Snethen v. Crispus Nix

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided July 24, 1984No. 83-2064PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEANEY, Circuit Judge.

Daniel Snethen appeals from the district court’s denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Snethen asserts the admission at trial of statements he made during a court-ordered psychiatric evaluation, and other statements he made to police officers while in custody, violated the fifth, sixth and fourteenth amendments. Because we find Snethen’s petition contains both exhausted and unexhausted claims, we vacate the district court’s judgment and remand with directions to dismiss Snethen’s petition. See Rose v. Lundy, 455 U.S. 509,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Engle v. IsaacSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Estelle v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Anderson v. HarlessSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Clarence Victor v. Frank X. HopkinsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
  2. Brown v. BerghuisDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2009
  3. Daniel W. Snethen v. Crispus NixCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
  4. Victor James Harrod, Jr. v. Charles Black, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
  5. Byrd v. ArmontroutDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1988

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API