Legal Opinion
Public Water Supply District No. 16 v. City of Buckner
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided September 23, 1997No. WD 53493PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SPINDEN, Judge.
When Buckner annexed and rezoned a tract in 1994 which Public Water Supply District M 16 had planned to serve, the district sued, asking the circuit court to enjoin Buckner from extending the city’s water service into the area without first complying with the requirements of § 247.170. 1 The circuit court dismissed the district’s lawsuit on the ground that it did not state a cause of action for which relief can be granted. We reverse and remand.
The annexed land was not developed, and the district did not have any water mains or easements in the tract. The district did have a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- Mathison v. Public Water Supply District No. 2Supreme Court of Missouri · 1966
- State Ex Rel. Stern Bros. & Co. v. StilleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
- Jackson County Public Water Supply District No. 1 v. Ong Aircraft Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1966
3Cited by11 opinions
- City of Harrisonville v. Public Water Supply District No. 9Missouri Court of Appeals · 2001
- Allen v. Public Water Supply District No. 5 of Jefferson CountyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
- Public Water Supply District No. 16 v. City of BucknerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
- Landwersiek v. DunivanMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
- Public Water Supply District No. 10 of Cass County v. City of PeculiarMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.