Legal Opinion

City of Harrisonville v. Public Water Supply District No. 9

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 29, 2001No. WD 58748, WD 58762PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWARD, Judge.

The City of Harrisonville (“the City”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment interpreting a contract between the City and Public Water Supply District No. 9 of Harrisonville, Missouri (“the District”) concerning the provision of water service to present and future customers in annexed territory within the District’s service area. The District also appeals from the trial court’s judgment. The City’s sole point on appeal is that the trial court erred in interpreting the agreement to allow the City to elect to provide water service only to specific customers and not annexed…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. Martin v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1999
  3. Ringstreet Northcrest, Inc. v. BisanzMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Anchor Centre Partners, Ltd. v. Mercantile Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  5. Marshall v. Pyramid Development Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1993

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Dunn Industrial Group, Inc. v. City of Sugar CreekSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
  2. Dubinsky v. MERMART, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
  3. Kyte v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Santa Fe Trail Neighborhood Redevelopment Corp. v. W.F. Coen & Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Schwarz v. GierkeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API