Legal Opinion

State v. Hicks

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1984No. 50211-1PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDore, J.

Bobby Lee Hicks appeals his conviction of second degree robbery. We hold that the trial court's refusal to instruct on the good faith claim of title defense was prejudicial error and remand for a new trial.

Facts

Hicks and the victim, Joseph Stills, were lifelong friends and, at the time of the incident, resided in the same hotel in downtown Seattle. The two men were ex-boxers and evidence at trial suggested they were both slightly punch-drunk. On January 8, 1982, Stills withdrew $1,176.20 from his bank account. He returned to the hotel, paid his rent, and encountered Hicks in the lobby. It was…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. WanrowWashington Supreme Court · 1977
  2. State v. McCullumWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State v. TheroffWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. State v. KjorsvikWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  2. In re the Personal Restraint of LaveryWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  3. In Re Personal Restraint of LaveryWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State v. AllertWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State v. CamaraWashington Supreme Court · 1989

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API