Sun Co. v. City of Syracuse Industrial Development Agency
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Boehm, J.
Petitioners, Sun Company, Inc. (Sun), Atlantic Refining & Marketing Company, Inc. (Atlantic), Citgo Petroleum Corporation (Citgo), and Mobil Oil Corporation (Mobil) (collectively, the Oil Companies) and Upstate Milk Cooperatives, Inc. (Upstate) challenge, pursuant to EDPL 207, the findings and determination of respondent, City of Syracuse Industrial Development Agency (SIDA), to condemn property owned by petitioners situated near the south shore of Onondaga Lake in the Oil City area of the City of Syracuse. The purpose of the taking is the proposed development of…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Society of Plastics Industry, Inc. v. County of SuffolkNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Jackson v. New York State Urban Development Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Akpan v. KochNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- Save the Pine Bush, Inc. v. City of AlbanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Mobil Oil Corp. v. Syracuse Industrial Development AgencyNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Halperin v. City of New RochelleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Kaufmann's Carousel, Inc. v. City of Syracuse Industrial Development AgencyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Mobil Oil Corp. v. City of Syracuse Industrial Development AgencyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Buerger v. Town of GraftonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Town of Coeymans v. City of AlbanyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.