Wabash Railroad v. Biddle
Indiana Court of Appeals
From Adams Circuit Court; D. D. Heller, Judge. Action by Henry Biddle against the Wabash Railroad Company for injuries received at a railroad crossing. Erom a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.
1Dissent
Dissenting Opinion, upon the Proposition that Appellant was not Entitled to Judgment on the Answers to Interrogatories.
Wiley, J.
— At the close of the original opinion, I stated that I concurred in the conclusion reached, but dissented from that part of the opinion holding that the facts specially found were not in irreconcilable conflict with the general verdict. An examination of the record embracing the interrogatories and the answers thereto has led me to the firm conviction that the general verdict and the answers to interrogatories can not stand together. If there is a reported case in…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Mann v. Belt Railroad & Stock Yard Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1891
- Smith v. Wabash RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
- Oleson v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1896
- Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. StickIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
- Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railway Co. v. HedgesIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.