Legal Opinion

Bethlehem Steel Co. v. Zurich General Accident & Liability Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 5, 1939No. Nos. 590, 591PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Black

As did Nos. 384 and 495, this day decided, ante, p. 247, these cases involve efforts to enforce foreign currency' provisions of bond obligations payable in money of the United States and optional fixed amounts of foreign currencies. The obligations are essentially similar to those in Nos. 384 and 495, but differ in two respects: (1) the bonds, originally sold in this country to a group of bankers, 1 were offered by that group not only in this country, but also abroad, and (2) the present holders are foreign corporations, some of whose bonds were bought in foreign countries. These distinctions…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Zurich General Accident & Liability Insurance v. Bethlehem Steel Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1939

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. ColemanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  2. Regnell v. PageNew York Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Emery Bird Thayer Dry Goods Co. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
  4. English Transcontinental, Ltd. v. Puebla Tramway, Light & Power Co.New York Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Hartmann v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API