William Joseph Hanlon, Jr. v. Waterman Steamship Corporation, Defendant-Respondent
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Per curiam
It was not contested below, nor is it upon this appeal, that the United States owned and operated the S. S. Bucyrus Victory, upon which the alleged assault upon the plaintiff seaman by a fellow seaman took place. The defendant was not an operating agent of the United States; its only connection with the vessel arose from its general agency contract with the United States which required [Article 3(d)] that “[t]he General Agent shall procure and make available to the Master for engagement by him the officers and men required to fill the complement of the vessel (i. e., the Bucyrus Victory).”…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Robins Dry Dock & Repair Co. v. FlintSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Cosmopolitan Shipping Co. v. McAllisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Brady v. Roosevelt Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Williams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1955
- Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Agwilines, IncCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Smith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1965
- Wood v. Standard Products Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1978
- Doyle v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Edward C. Carter v. American Export Isbrandtsen Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- American Petroleum & Transport, Inc. v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.