Legal Opinion

Bateman v. Case

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1912No. Docket No. 90PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from St. Joseph; Yaple, J. Bill by Charles C. Bateman and others against Fred H. Case, executor of the estate of Harriet M. Bateman, deceased, for the construction of the will of David M. Bateman, deceased. From a decree for complainants, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtSteere, J.

The purpose of this suit is to obtain a construction of the will of David M. Bateman, deceased. The question is raised by demurrer to complainants’ bill and is brought to this court by appeal taken from an order of the circuit court overruling said demurrer.

The bill of complaint states that David M. Bateman died October 6,1901. He left two sons, the complainants herein, and a widow, Harriet M. Bateman, stepmother of complainants. His will, dated September 26, 1900, contains but three clauses; the first of which merely provides for the payment of his lawful debts. The second and third, which…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Defreese v. LakeMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Toms v. WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Jones v. JonesMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Morford v. DieffenbackerMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Hamlin v. United States Express Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1883

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Gardner v. City National Bank & Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Quarton v. BartonMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Sellick v. SellickMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Gibson v. GibsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  5. In Re Inheritance Tax on Dale's EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API