Legal Opinion

Sellick v. Sellick

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided August 9, 1919No. Docket No. 3PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Van Burén; Des Voignes, J. Bill by William R. Sellick against Arthur F. Sellick and another for the construction of a will. From a decree for plaintiff, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.

This case involves the construction oi; the will of William J. Sellick, late of Paw Paw, Van Burén county, and the effect as between certain of the legatees of the election of the widow to take under the statute. Mr. Sellick left real estate inventoried at $8,500 and personal property inventoried at upwards of $176,000. He left a widow, Caroline Sellick, and one son, William R. Sellick, the plaintiff,, now grown to manhood, who was the child of a former wife. He also left collateral kindred, including the defendants Arthur F. Sellick, a nephew, and Gertrude Sellick, a niece. To his collateral…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Ford v. FordWisconsin Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Carper v. CrowlIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  4. Jones v. JonesMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Brandenburg v. ThorndikeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Tomb v. BardoSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941
  2. Ruh's Executors v. RuhCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
  3. In Re Povey's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Vanderlip v. SchlyternNebraska Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Gibson v. GibsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1921

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API