Lund v. Myers

BROWN, Judge.

¶ 1 Bradford D. Lund, and William and Sherry Lund (individually “Bradford,” “William,” and “Sherry”; collectively “the Lunds”), filed this special action seeking to prevent the superior court from conducting an in camera inspection of inadvertently disclosed documents, which they claim are sub*447ject to protection by the attorney-client privilege or work product doctrine.1 The Lunds also argue that if an in camera inspection is warranted, it must not be conducted by the assigned trial judge. For the following reasons, we hold that the judge abused his discretion by ordering that the…