Legal Opinion

Bradford Lund v. Hon. Myers

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided July 16, 2013No. CV-12-0349-PRPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRUTINEL, Justice.

¶ 1 We address when a trial court, in deciding issues of privilege and waiver, may review in camera allegedly privileged documents that were inadvertently disclosed. 1 We hold that before reviewing a particular document, a trial court must first determine that in camera review is necessary to resolve the privilege claim.

I

¶2 This litigation began in 2009, when relatives of Bradford Lund (the real parties in interest in this case, collectively, “Miller”) sought the appointment of a guardian and conservator to manage Bradford’s assets. Bradford, his father, and his…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. ZolinSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. LeeArizona Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Lund v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Otto v. OttoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
  2. State of Arizona Ex Rel Adel v. Hon. AdlemanArizona Supreme Court · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API