Legal Opinion

Spreckels v. Bender

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1897PublishedCited by 1 opinion

From Coos: J. C. Fullerton, Judge. Action to recover the amount of three certain notes given to aid a railroad subsidy, and transferred to plaintiff. Defendant appeals from a judgment against him.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Wolverton.

This is an action by the J. D. Spreclcels & Bros. Company to recover on three promissory notes executed by Edward Bender, and made payable to the Coos Bay, Rose-burg & Eastern Railroad & Navigation Company’ or order. The circumstances attending and which induced their, execution are as follows: In May, 1890, the defendant, with others, executed a certain subsidy agreement. *579whereby he agreed to pay the said railroad company $1,250, in installments, as certain definite portions of a railroad were constructed eastward from Marshfield, the last payment to be made…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dugan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1818
  2. Dollfus v. FroschCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1845
  3. Porter v. CushmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1858
  4. Williams v. Hartford & New-Haven Rail-roadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1840
  5. O'Donald v. Evansville, Indianapolis, & Cleveland Straight Line RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1860

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hughes v. HelzerOregon Supreme Court · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API