Legal Opinion

Rasmussen v. Schweizer

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1927PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOwen, J.

This appeal presents the question of whether that portion of the judgment of the trial court sfetting aside the trustees’ deed can be sustained. The reasons which prompted this action on the part of the trial court are probably voiced in the findings of that court, to the effect that the purchase of the stock of the complaining stockholders on the part of the corporation “was in furtherance of an intention to dissolve and wind up the affairs of said corporation,” and “that if such trust agreement were to be carried out, the plaintiffs and other stockholders similarly situated would receive,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Marvin v. AndersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Pabst v. GoodrichWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Atlanta & Walworth Butter & Cheese Ass'n v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Fiedler v. HowardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Alexander v. . AlexanderNew York Court of Appeals · 1887

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Wyandotte Chemicals Corp. v. Royal Electric Manufacturing Company, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Koeppler v. Crocker Chair Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Stevens Construction Corp. v. Draper Hall, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Scriggins v. Thomas Dalby Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  5. Barrett v. W. A. Webster Lumber Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API