People v. Bretti
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
At defendant’s trial an accomplice, Mastracco, testified at length as to defendant’s role in orchestrating Dawn Grillo’s murder. The People introduced a taped conversation between Mastracco and defendant, for the purpose of corroborating Mastracco’s testimony (CPL 60.22). Defendant challenges the sufficiency of the corroborating evidence as equivocal. Even though subject to an innocent interpretation, the taped conversation " ' "so harmonize[d] with the accomplice’s narrative as to have a tendency to furnish…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. KohutNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
- People v. MorhouseNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
- People v. FarruggiaNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
3Cited by19 opinions
- People v. SteinbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- People v. ReomeNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
- People v. BrelandNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- People v. VargasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- People v. SternAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.