King v. . Winants
Supreme Court of North Carolina
PetitioN, to re-hear this ease, which was decided in this Court at June Term, 1874. The facts, pertinent to the case, as decided, are fully set out in 71 N. C. Rep., 468, and it is deemed unnecessary to report them again.
1Opinion of the Court
Bynum:, J.
When a ease, which has been once decided by this Court, is again brought before it for a re-hearing, ;in the manner prescribed by law, it is the unquestionable duty of the Court, not only to re examine the grounds of the former decision, but to carefully consider any new and additional argument or authority which may be presented with the view of changing the judgment of the Court. This duty we have attempted to discharge, but the result is that we have been unable to discover any error in the former decision, and 'that w.e must, therefore, adhere to and affirm it.
In the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Woodworth v. . BennettNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Morris Run Coal Co. v. Barclay Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1871
- McKenzie v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lamm v. CrumplerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Weisel v. . CobbSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
- Lindsay v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878