Hollander v. Fechheimer
Supreme Court of the United States
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OE THE DISTRICT OE COLUMBIA. This was a bill in equity filed by the firm of Eechheimer, Groodkind & Co., against Justus Hollander, a judgment debtor, Samuel Bieber, his assignee, and a number of preferred creditors under such assignment, alleging that the assignment was fraudulent and void, and praying that Hollander might be required to disclose the amount of his indebtedness to each of his preferred creditors; the amount of goods purchased by…
Read the full summary
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OE THE DISTRICT OE COLUMBIA. This was a bill in equity filed by the firm of Eechheimer, Groodkind & Co., against Justus Hollander, a judgment debtor, Samuel Bieber, his assignee, and a number of preferred creditors under such assignment, alleging that the assignment was fraudulent and void, and praying that Hollander might be required to disclose the amount of his indebtedness to each of his preferred creditors; the amount of goods purchased by him immediately prior to his failure, and the names of the persons from whom purchased; the amount of his indebtedness…
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bkown
It is clear that this appeal must be dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. The decree from which the appeal was taken declares the assignment from Hollander to the defendant Bieber to.be fraudulent and void as against the complainants, and “ that said complainants do have and recover from the said defendant Bieber the amount of their judgment set out in the bill of complaint, together with their costs in this cause, to be taxed by the clerk; and it is further ordered that this cause be remanded to the special term for further proceedings.” The amount of the judgment referred to in the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- New England Mortgage Security Co. v. GaySupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Union Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. KirchoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
3Cited by6 opinions
- California National Bank v. StatelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Hutchinson v. Otis, Wilcox & Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1902
- Massachusetts Protective Ass'n v. KittlesDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1923
- Grand Rapids & Indiana Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Fuchs v. Kansas City Southern Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1912
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.