Legal Opinion

Burgdorf v. Holme-Shaw

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 13, 1959No. Docket 15, Calendar 47,317PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDethmers, C. J.

Plaintiff appeals from judgment non obstante veredicto for defendant city. He sued for damages resulting from injuries sustained when he rode, after dark on a bicycle, into a clothesline stretched across a public sidewalk.

Under CL 1948, § 242.1 (Stat Ann § 9.591), defendant city is liable to pay just damages to any person injured by reason of its neglect to keep its sidewalk in condition reasonably safe for travel.

In Jablonski v. City of Bay City, 248 Mich 306, it was held that “a wire strung dangerously across a walk,” even though by one not connected with the city government, would be “an…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jablonski v. City of Bay CityMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Cornell v. City of YpsilantiMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Sutter v. Kansas CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1909
  4. Drake v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1905
  5. Rex v. Village of LochmoorMichigan Supreme Court · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. O'HARE v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Peters v. Department of State HighwaysMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Hargis v. City of Dearborn HeightsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  4. Beamon v. City of Highland ParkMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. Shumko v. CenterMichigan Supreme Court · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API