Legal Opinion

Houston v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)

Decided April 13, 2006No. 03-04-00725-CRPublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BEA ANN SMITH, Justice.

A jury convicted Sherman Houston of the offense of delivery of a controlled substance in the amount of four grams but less than two hundred grams and assessed punishment at forty-five years in prison. See Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. § 481.112 (West 2003). In his first issue, Houston contends that the trial court abused its discretion by admitting extraneous evidence of two later delivery offenses. In his second and third issues, Houston challenges both his conviction and sentence, contending that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel. We affirm the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
  3. Old Chief v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Michelson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Hernandez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Jeannie Coutta v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2012
  2. Jarmon v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2006
  3. Jacobson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2011
  4. Adam Stanley v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2012
  5. Adam Stanley v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2012

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API