Legal Opinion

United States v. Albert James Goodheim

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 27, 1981No. 80-1408PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:

Goodheim appeals his jury conviction of two counts of making false statements in connection with the acquisition of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(a)(6), two counts of receipt of a firearm by a convicted felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(h)(1), and one count of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C.App. § 1202(a)(1). 1 One of the two false statements in each of the latter two counts consisted of Goodheim’s representation that he was not a convicted felon. Goodheim claims that his prior state felony conviction is…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
  4. Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State v. GoreWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Chamberlain v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1990
  3. United States v. Wayne Doyce McWilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  4. United States v. Albert James GoodheimCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  5. United States v. Robert Glynn ChambersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API