United States v. Albert James Goodheim
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
REINHARDT, Circuit Judge.
Goodheim appealed his conviction on several counts which required, as a predicate, proof of a previous felony conviction. We reversed and remanded for an evidentiary hearing to determine whether Goodheim’s guilty plea on the prior felony was voluntary and intelligent, in compliance with Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 89 S.Ct. 1709, 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969). United States v. Goodheim, 651 F.2d 1294 (9th Cir. 1981). The reasons for the remand and the facts relevant to the additional issues which we reserved pending completion of the hearing on remand are fully set forth…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Whalen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- United States v. Perry York, United States of America v. Peter Andrew RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Erwin Darrell NewmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. James Berry, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Gilbert Martinez-JimenezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. WarrenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.