Legal Opinion
Leialoha v. City of Jacksonville
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided May 5, 1953PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
64 So.2d 924 (1953)
LEIALOHA
v.
CITY OF JACKSONVILLE.
Supreme Court of Florida, Division A.
May 5, 1953.
Will O. Murrell and Wm. O. Murrell, Jr., Jacksonville, for appellant.
William M. Madison and Inman P. Crutchfield, Jacksonville, for appellee.
TERRELL, Justice.
Appellant sued the City of Jacksonville to recover damages for personal injuries on the theory that the city permitted holes to exist in the shoulders of Kings Avenue in Block 1800, sometimes known as State Road No. 5, whereby she was injured while operating her automobile thereon. The city answered denying negligence, charged contributory…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sloper v. City of QuincyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Gillespie v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- City of Tallahassee v. FortuneSupreme Court of Florida · 1850
- City of Tampa v. EastonSupreme Court of Florida · 1940
- City of Tallahassee v. ColesSupreme Court of Florida · 1941
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Godwin v. County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
- Nobles v. City of JacksonvilleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
- The City of Miami v. Western Shipping and Trading Company, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
- Hale v. City of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
- Melville v. Miami ShoresDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.