Legal Opinion

Danziger v. San Jacinto Savings Ass'n

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 16, 1986No. 01-84-0701-CVPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JACK SMITH, Justice.

This is a usury suit filed by the appellants claiming violations of the Texas Consumer Credit Code and the Federal Truth-In-Lending Act. The trial court held that the appellee had not contracted for, charged, or received usurious interest and had not violated the Federal Truth-In-Lending Act. A take-nothing judgment was entered.

The appellants made arrangements with the appellee to enter into a contract for a home improvement loan. On August 5, *31980, the promissory note and other papers attendant to the loan were executed. All of the instruments were dated August 5…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Holley v. WattsTexas Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Nevels v. HarrisTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Tanner Development Co. v. FergusonTexas Supreme Court · 1977
  4. First State Bank of Bedford v. MillerTexas Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Ross v. WalkerTexas Supreme Court · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Danziger v. San Jacinto Savings Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Danziger v. San Jacinto Savings Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State v. Jerry DuffeyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API