Succession of Saloy
Supreme Court of Louisiana
APPEAL from the Civil District Court for the Parish of Orleans. Eightor, J. 1. The public administrator has no right to provoke the removal of an administrator. 34 An. 728. Nor to annul a decree so that he may administer. 26 An. 162. 2. The State can not bastardize the offspring of a married woman.
Read the full summary
APPEAL from the Civil District Court for the Parish of Orleans. Eightor, J. 1. The public administrator has no right to provoke the removal of an administrator. 34 An. 728. Nor to annul a decree so that he may administer. 26 An. 162. 2. The State can not bastardize the offspring of a married woman. The child of a married woman is presumed to be the child of the husband, and this presumption can only be destroyed by a decree rendered in an action en desalen, which action can be brought by no one but the husband and his heirs, as prescribed by Arts. 191 and 192 of the Civil Code, nor can the…
1Opinion of the Court
*435The opinion of the court was delivered by
Bermudez, O. J.
The transcript contains several judgments which are brought up for review.
I
The widow of Saloy having died intestate, a contest arose for the administration of her succession, and two administrators were appointed, who took the oath and furnished the bond required by law.
After these administrators had taken possession of the estate and entered upon the discharge of their functions, the public administrator brought suit to have the appointments vacated and himself appointed administrator of the succession.
The grounds upon which he relied…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Bennett v. MorrisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1835
3Cited by27 opinions
- Feazel v. FeazelSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1952
- State v. RandallSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1951
- Chabrán Hernández v. Méndez RíosSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1953
- Ellis v. HendersonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
- Succession of LacosstSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1917
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.