Legal Opinion
Seery v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided January 11, 1955No. 340-52PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MADDEN, Judge.
The Government moves to dismiss the plaintiff’s petition on the ground that this court has no jurisdiction to adjudicate this case for three reasons which will be discussed in the course of this opinion. For the purposes of the motion, we adopt the plaintiff’s recital of the facts.
The plaintiff is a citizen of the United States, naturalized in 1944, and has resided in the United States since 1935. She owns certain real property and the houses thereon in Austria, at Unterach am Attersee, which she acquired during or before 1929. She was also the owner of personal property,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. PinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United States v. BelmontSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Geofroy v. RiggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- The Cherokee TobaccoSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Doe v. BradenSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Porter v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
- Juda v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
- Fred E. Langenegger, Steven W. Langenegger v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- El-Shifa Pharmaceutical Industries Company and Salah El Din Ahmed Mohammed Idris v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- South Puerto Rico Sugar Company Trading Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.