Legal Opinion

Getto v. Friend

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1891PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error from Sedgwick Court of Common Pleas. Action to foreclose mechanics’ liens. The material facts are stated in the opinion. Judgment in the court below, at the May term, 1889.

1Opinion of the Court

*25Opinion by

Simpson, C.:

Four actions were commenced in the court below to foreclose so many mechanics’ liens upon property known as “Lot No. 13, on Goethe avenue, in Getto’s second addition to the city of Wichita.” All parties holding mortgages upon the property were made defendants in these actions. These suits were consolidated, tried by the court, the order of priority of all liens was determined, and the final decree established the rights of all parties. Two of the parties bring questions affecting their rights to this court for review. The material facts are, that on the 23d day of May,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Von Hoffman v. City of QuincySupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  2. Edwards v. KearzeySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Planters' Bank v. SharpSupreme Court of the United States · 1848
  4. Chicago Lumber Co. v. SchweiterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891
  5. Seitz v. Union Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1876

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Basham v. Goodholm & Sparrow Inv. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Eastern Ohio Oil Co. v. McEvoySupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  3. Toler v. SatterthwaiteSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  4. Norris v. NitschSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  5. Cahill-Swift Mfg. Co. v. SayerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API