Legal Opinion

Samsel v. Diaz

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided September 22, 1983No. 13-82-167-CVPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

YOUNG, Justice.

Harry and Lois Samsel petitioned the District Court of Bee County to remove the body of their deceased son David from the Tuleta Community Cemetery and to reinter it in Karnes County Cemetery. They alleged that it was difficult to maintain the grave because of the location and condition of the cemetery. The Samsels named the Tuleta Community Cemetery Association and David’s widow, Roxanne Chandler Diaz, as defendants in the suit. After judgment was rendered against them, the Samsels brought this appeal.

The sole point of error is that the trial court erroneously submitted…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Boaz v. White's Auto StoresTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  2. First State Bank & Trust Co. of Edinburg v. GeorgeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  3. McDonald Transit, Inc. v. MooreTexas Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Terrill v. HarbinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  5. Fowlkes v. FowlkesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Texaco, Inc. v. Pennzoil, Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1987
  2. European Crossroads' Shopping Center, Ltd. v. Criswell, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1995
  3. Louisiana & Arkansas Railway Co. v. BlakelyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
  4. Dempsey v. Apache Shores Property Owners Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
  5. Dueitt v. Dueitt, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API