Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Cotto v. Hendrix

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided June 11, 2025No. 3:25-cv-00066Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION DAVID COTTO, Plaintiff, v. CAUSE NO. 3:25-CV-66-JD-JEM JACK HENDRIX, et al., Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER David Cotto, a prisoner without a lawyer, was ordered to show cause why the initial partial filing fee was not paid. (ECF 7.) He responded to this order (ECF 8), and the docket reflects that the fee has now been received. (ECF 9.) Therefore, the case will proceed to screening. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, the court must screen the complaint and dismiss it if it is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim upon…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API