Legal Opinion

Republic Insurance v. Feidler

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided November 17, 1998No. 1 CA-CV 97-0047PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GARBARINO, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 Republic Insurance Company (Republic) brought a declaratory judgment action against Robert Michael Feidler (Feidler) to determine whether the intentional acts exclusion of a homeowners insurance policy denied him coverage for his injuries. The jury decided that when Thomas Davis (Davis) repeatedly stabbed Feidler, he did not possess sufficient mental capacity to form the intent to injure Feidler; therefore, the intentional acts exclusion of Davis’s homeowners insurance policy did not apply. Republic challenges the verdict and the resulting judgment…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Burd v. Sussex Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
  2. Ruvolo v. American Casualty Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
  3. Tovrea Land and Cattle Company v. LinsenmeyerArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Transamerica Insurance Group v. MeereArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Gemstar Ltd. v. Ernst & YoungArizona Supreme Court · 1996

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cretens v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.District Court, D. Arizona · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API