Legal Opinion

Shiflett's Administratrix v. Virginia Railway & Power Co.

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided March 15, 1923PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Error to a judgment of the Hustings Court, Part II, of the city of Richmond, in an action of trespass on the case. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff assigns error.

1Opinion of the CourtBurks, J.

This is an action to recover damages for the death of the plaintiff’s intestate occasioned by a collision with a street car of the defendant, which the plaintiff alleges was negligently operated. There was a verdict and judgment for the defendant, and the plaintiff assigns error.

Broad street, in the city of Richmond, runs practically east and west, and along the center of it there is the defendant’s double street car track; the two tracks being about eight feet apart. In the space between the tracks, at the scene of the collision, there is a row of trees about forty feet apart. Lombardy…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bresee v. Los Angeles Traction Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Virginia Railway & Power Co. v. GorsuchSupreme Court of Virginia · 1917
  3. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. ArringtonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1919
  4. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. StockSupreme Court of Virginia · 1905
  5. Lynn v. GoodwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Barnes v. AshworthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1930
  2. Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. HarrisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1950
  3. Warner v. MarkoeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1937
  4. Yeary v. HolbrookSupreme Court of Virginia · 1938
  5. Burks v. Webb, AdministratrixSupreme Court of Virginia · 1957

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API