Legal Opinion

Watzke v. City and County of San Francisco

District Court, N.D. California

Decided October 3, 2022No. 4:22-cv-05469Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 NICHOLAS WATZKE, Case No. 22-cv-05469-JST 8 Plaintiff, ORDER OF DISMISSAL v. 9 Re: ECF No. 1 10 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 13 Plaintiff Nicholas Watzke filed this pro se action. He has been granted leave to proceed in 14 forma pauperis in a separate order. ECF No. 12. The Court now screens Plaintiff’s complaint, 15 ECF No. 1, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. For the reasons set forth below, this action is 16 DISMISSED with prejudice. 17 DISCUSSION 18 A. Standard of Review 19 Under 28…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Raymond Watison v. Mary CarterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  4. Alvera M. Aldabe v. Charles D. AldabeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  5. U.S. Anchor Mfg., Inc. v. Rule Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API