Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Commonwealth v. Coleman

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 13, 1978No. 211Published

1Concurrence

SPAETH, Judge,

in support of reversal:

While I agree that the evidence was sufficient to prove possession of heroin, I cannot agree that it was sufficient to prove that appellant brought the drug* into prison.

There being no direct evidence that appellant brought heroin into prison, his conviction on that charge rests solely on inferences from circumstantial evidence. Such evidence may be sufficient, as the cases cited by Judge IPrice demonstrate, provided we are satisfied that “the inferred fact is more likely than not to flow from the proved fact on which it is made to depend.” Judge Price’s…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Commonwealth v. TownsendSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  3. Commonwealth v. TurnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Hodges v. KleinDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1976
  5. State v. LawrenceUtah Supreme Court · 1951

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API