Quisenberry v. Kartsonis
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
COIL, Commissioner.
This is a garnishment proceeding wherein plaintiff sought to recover $10,000 from garnishee, the amount of a judgment theretofore rendered in favor of plaintiff and against defendant in the damage suit. Verdict and judgment were for garnishee and plaintiff has appealed.
Automobile Dealers Mutual Insurance Company issued to defendant, Mary A. Kartsonis, its insurance policy covering her automobile by which insurer agreed, inter alia, to pay on behalf of insured all sums (up to $15,000 for one person in each accident) which insured became legally obligated to pay because of…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Rippe v. SutterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
- Cowell v. Employers Indemnity Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1930
- Finkle v. Western Automobile InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1930
- Allegretto v. Oregon Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1932
- Valladao v. Fireman's Fund Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1939
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Greer v. Zurich Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
- Susie Randolph v. Employers Mutual Liability Insurance Company of Wisconsin GarnisheeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1958
- Meyers v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
- Motorists Mut. Ins. Co. v. Johnson, Admrx.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1966
- Kurz v. CollinsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.