Legal Opinion

(PC) Keel v. Pine

District Court, E.D. California

Decided December 3, 2021No. 2:16-cv-01946Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RICKY RAY KEEL, Case No. 2:16-cv-01946-TLN-JDP (PC) 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS THAT DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO 13 v. DISMISS BE GRANTED 14 PINE, et al., OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN DAYS 15 Defendants. ECF No. 51 16 17 18 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in this action brought under 19 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He alleges that defendants Pine and Fleming violated his First Amendment 20 rights by placing him in administrative segregation in retaliation for his filing a…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. United States v. Donald Lawrence Ritchie, Heather Horner, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  5. Javiad Akhtar v. J. MesaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API