Hoenig v. Newmark
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
WADDILL, Commissioner.
The appeal is from a judgment declaring a portion of the residuary clause of the will of Lucile Newmark void for uncertainty and directing distribution of the residue of the estate to certain beneficiaries in accordance with an alternate provision of the will. Appellants, who are the executors and trustees under the will, urge that the residuary clause of Miss Newmark’s will points out with reasonable certainty the beneficiaries and the purpose of the charity, and therefore is a valid disposition of the residue of the estate.
The residuary clause contained in Item VII…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Spalding v. St. Joseph's Industrial SchoolCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1899
- Coleman, &c. v. O'Leary's Exr.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1902
- Gooding v. Watson's TrusteeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
- Gerick's v. GerickCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
- Stoeer v. MeyerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re Ditz's EstateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1962
- Busch v. BauteSupreme Court of Iowa · 1962
- Davis v. CaryCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1968
- Marva Huckabee v. Texas Department of Mental Health and Mental Retardation, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1997