Legal Opinion

Duer Wagner & Co. v. City of Sweetwater

Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)

Decided June 18, 2003No. 11-00-00276-CVPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

W.G. ARNOT, III, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from a condemnation proceeding wherein the only issue in the trial court was the value of the property taken by eminent domain. The parties waived a jury trial, and the trial court found that the land had a total value of $556,110. Duer Wagner appeals. We reverse and remand.

Duer Wagner owned an undivided 39.232955 percent of the 1,798.4 acres that were condemned by the City of Sweetwa-ter. The City condemned the property in order to obtain water from the underlying aquifer as an additional, municipal water supply source. For many years…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Exxon Pipeline Co. v. ZwahrTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  2. City of Harlingen v. Estate of SharboneauTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Religious of the Sacred Heart of Texas v. City of HoustonTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Brazos River Conservation & Reclamation Dist. v. CostelloCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
  5. Coastal Industrial Water Authority v. Trinity Portland Cement Division, General Portland Cement Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. John McNeill, Jr, R.Ph. And Nichols Southside Pharmacy v. Courtney N. Phillips, Executive Commissioner Sylvia Hernandez Kauffman, Inspector General And Texas Health and Human Services Commission, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API