Legal Opinion

Ray Jewelry Co. v. Darling

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1930No. Docket No. 48, Calendar No. 34,786PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPotter, J.

Plaintiff sued Florence Darling in assumpsit in the common pleas court of Detroit. Personal service was made on defendant, who did not appear either in person or by attorney. Plaintiff undertook to prove its claim. When it appeared a copy of the written contract between plaintiff and defendant Florence Darling had not been served on defendant, the court, on its own motion, dismissed plaintiff’s case. It thereupon removed the cause to the circuit court for Wayne county by certiorari, where the holding in the common pleas court was affirmed. Plaintiff brings error, claiming that the common…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Paley v. Coca Cola CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Millman Brothers, Inc. v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966
  3. Hoffman v. BosMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. People v. MordellMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. McInerney v. MyroldMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API