Legal Opinion
People v. Mordell
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided September 11, 1974No. Docket 18541PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.
This case comes to us on a concise statement of facts which focus the single issue of whether an alleged violation of Rule 9, § 1 of the rules of the Recorder’s Court for the City of Detroit is grounds for granting defendant’s motion to suppress the evidence and dismissal of the charge against defendant of knowingly or intentionally possessing heroin contrary to MCLA 335.341(4)a; MSA 18.1070(41)(4)(a).
Section 1 of Rule 9 of the Recorder’s Court Rules, approved by the Supreme Court July 20, 1970, provides:
"RULE 9
"Felony Warrants, Arrests and Arraignments
’’Section 1. Issuance of Warrants.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Perin v. PeulerMichigan Supreme Court · 1964
- Buscaino v. RhodesMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
- State v. BisacciaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. DylaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- People v. LivingstonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. JokerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
- Hoffman v. BosMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
- People v. JokerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.