In Re Craven
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
P,er Curiam:
The respondent, Samuel C. Craven, a practicing attorney in Charleston, South Carolina was unanimously found guilty of professional misconduct by the three member hearing panel and full Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline in that he knew his employee was engaged in solicitation of professional employment for him on three occasions in violation of the Code of Professional Responsibility, Supreme Court Rule 32.
The report of the panel discloses that Harold Gantlin, employed by respondent to work around his law office and farm, approached Mrs. Ethel Sheppard as she was…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In Re BloomSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
3Cited by6 opinions
- Matter of JenkinsIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
- Matter of ReavesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
- Idaho State Bar v. JenkinsIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
- Doe v. CondonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- In the Matter of BeattieSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.