Legal Opinion
Asbestos Workers Local Union No. 42 Welfare Fund v. Brewster
Supreme Court of Delaware
Decided November 21, 2007No. 568, 2006PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RIDGELY, Justice.
This appeal arises from a subrogation action brought by Appellant Asbestos Workers Local No. 42 Welfare Fund (the “Fund”) against Appellees Thomas L. Brewster, Sr., Candace L. Brewster, and Charles Snyderman, Esquire. The Fund was established under the Employment Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) 1 for the benefit of the members of Asbestos Workers Local No. 42 (“Local 42”) and their dependents. It operates pursuant to a Summary Plan Description (the “Plan”) and the provisions of ERISA. Mr. Brewster is a member of Local 42 and Mrs. Brewster qualifies as his…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Aetna Health Inc. v. DavilaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Fort Halifax Packing Co. v. CoyneSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance v. KnudsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ramirez v. MurdickSupreme Court of Delaware · 2008
- Rogers v. Christina School DistrictSupreme Court of Delaware · 2013
- Invictus Special Situations Master I, L.P. v. Invictus Global Management, LLCCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2025
- LHC Group, Inc.v. Abbott LaboratoriesSuperior Court of Delaware · 2023