Legal Opinion · Dissent

Prescott v. PNC Bank Corp.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided July 7, 2000Published

1Dissent

RODRÍGUEZ, A.A., J.A.D.,

dissenting.

I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion. I would reverse, holding that plaintiffs claim for sex discrimination is time-barred.

I agree with the majority that in Montells v. Haynes, 133 N.J. 282, 627 A.2d 654 (1993), the Supreme Court expressly made its *538ruling, that the two-year statute of limitations set by N.J.S.A. 2A:14-2 applies to a LAD action, prospective only. However, in my view, the Supreme Court also impliedly held that there is an outside limit of two years from the date of the Montells ’ decision to file a LAD action when the operative…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Montells v. HaynesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
  2. Wilson v. Wal-Mart StoresSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
  3. Green v. Auerbach Chevrolet Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
  4. Standard v. VasNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1995
  5. Poveromo-Spring v. Exxon Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API