Legal Opinion

Burton v. Klaus

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 11, 2014No. ED 98171PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KURT S. ODENWALD, Judge.

Introduction

Richard and Patricia Burton (“the Bur-tons”) appeal from the trial court’s judgment awarding attorney fees to Janice Klaus (“Klaus”). On appeal, the Burtons claim that the trial court’s judgment awarding attorney fees is invalid because the trial court lacked jurisdiction over the case when it entered its judgment. Because the Burtons did not preserve their challenge to the trial court’s judgment and award of attorney fees for appeal, we dismiss the appeal.

Factual and Procedural History

In June 2009, the Burtons entered into a residential sale contract with…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Taylor v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. Maskill v. CumminsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. Glandon v. Daimler Chrysler Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. St. Louis Union Station Holdings, Inc. v. Discovery Channel Store, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Schrader v. QuikTrip Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2009

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Heifetz v. Apex Clayton, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2018
  2. Kenneth Ferguson v. Curators of Lincoln University, In Their Official Capacities, a/k/a Lincoln UniversityMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. Developers Surety and Indemnity Company v. Woods of Somerset, LLC.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. Jean-Robert Nast by and through his guardian Jan Freeman, Plaintiff/Respondent v. Gateway Ambulance Service, LLC, Defendants/Respondents. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London, Proposed Intervenor/Appellant.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. C.R.S. v. C.M.H.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2017

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API