Legal Opinion

Salmon v. City of Bloomington

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 11, 2002No. 53A01-0107-CV-256PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BARNES, Judge.

Case Summary

Residents of the Browncliff Subdivision ("Residents") of the City of Bloomington ("City") appeal the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the City in the Residents' action seeking to disannex their properties from the City and for other related relief. We affirm.

Issue

The restated issue before us is whether the City has succeeded in establishing that there are no genuine issues of fact and that, as a matter of law, the Residents are not entitled to relief pursuant to our disan-nexation statute, Indiana Code Section 36-4-3-16.

Facts

The designated…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Chidester v. City of HobartIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Abbott v. BatesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Town Council of New Harmony v. ParkerIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
  4. WorldCom Network Services, Inc. v. ThompsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Black v. ACandS, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sadler v. State Ex Rel. SandersIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. Town of Cloverdale v. RennerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API