Legal Opinion
Sarin v. Ochsner
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided January 7, 2000No. 98-P-442PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDreben, J.
In December, 1993, the plaintiff, a limited partner of Royal Capital Partners, L.P., brought an action against the *422general partners of the firm, Neal Ochsner and Royal Capital Corporation, a Delaware corporation,2 alleging, among other matters, a breach of fiduciary duties, including a failure to give the plaintiff the accountings and the distributions to which he was entitled. Judgment entered for the plaintiff on January 13, 1995. By motion under Mass.R.Civ.R 60(b)(4), or, in the alternative, under 60(b)(6),3 365 Mass. 829 (1974), filed on December 17, 1997, almost three years after the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Swift & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Noble v. Union River Logging RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Robert James Lubben v. Selective Service System Local Board No. 27Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1972
- General Investment Co. v. New York Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Walling v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Lapidus v. HechtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Halebian v. BervCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- Conservation Commission v. PachecoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2000
- Lothrop v. North American Air Charter, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015
- Owens v. MukendiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.