Legal Opinion
Layman v. Webb
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided February 24, 1960No. A-12866PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POWELL, Presiding Judge.
This is an original proceeding wherein A. H. Layman, Thomas Clinton Layman, and Andrew H. Layman seek a writ of prohibition directed to Hon. Leslie Webb, District Judge, Tulsa County, commanding him to desist and refrain from further actions against defendants who refused to answer certain questions and to produce certain records at instance of a grand jury of Tulsa County, on the ground that to do so might incriminate them.
On the filing of the petition in this Court on February 2, 1960, we issued an alternative writ of prohibition and directed the district court of…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Blair v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Wilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Maxwell v. DowSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Temple v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1881
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Oklahoma Department of Public Safety v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
- O'NEAL v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1970
- Nuckols v. Van WagnerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1973
- Presta v. OwsleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1961
- Clem v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.