International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local No. 129 Benefit Fund v. Tucci
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtBotsford, J.
In these consolidated cases, shareholders of a publicly traded corporation claim that a merger transaction proposed by the board of directors will result in the effective sale of the corporation for an inadequate price. The question we consider is whether they may bring that claim directly against the board members, or must bring it as a derivative claim on behalf of the corporation. We answer that the claim must be brought derivatively. 4
Background. The plaintiffs appeal from the dismissal of their first amended class action complaint (complaint) 5 alleging breaches of fiduciary duty by the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Tooley v. Donaldson, Lufkin, & Jenrette, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2004
- Demoulas v. Demoulas Super Markets, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
- Donahue v. Rodd Electrotype Co. of New England, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Spiegel v. Beacon Participations, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Maz Partners LP v. Shear (In Re PHC, Inc. S'holder Litig.)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018
- MAZ Partners LP v. ShearDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2017
- Banks v. SabaDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2021
- Chuduk v. AvraamovMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2019
- Colin Booth v. Evan Smith, Katherine Faulkner, and Highland Park Technologies, Inc.Massachusetts Superior Court · 2025
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.