Commonwealth v. Glancy

Hargest, P. J.,

This case comes before us on a motion to quash the indictment for conspiracy for the following reasons:

1. That the indictment charges a different offence than that charged in the mformation upon which it is based.

2. That the indictment does not sufficiently and specifically set forth facts ¡ither constituting an unlawful act or an unlawful means of accomplishing m act in connection with the matters charged.

3. That there is a variance between the indictment and the information, in ;hat the information charges that Glancy knew that there were no funds from vhich to pay the check,…