Legal Opinion

Kimoktoak v. State

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1978No. 3212PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MATTHEWS, Justice.

The main issue in this appeal is whether the defendant was deprived of his right to sequestration of the jury when the trial judge allowed the jurors to separate for three days after they had begun their deliberations.

Edward Kimoktoak was charged with joyriding, operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated, and operating a motor vehicle without a license. After Kimoktoak entered pleas of not guilty to all three charges, the cases were jointly tried to a jury. 1 At trial, the principal witnesses for the State were two officers from the Anchorage Police Department. The…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Gafford v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1968
  2. State v. HannaganAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  3. United States v. James J. D'AntonioCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1965
  4. State v. ConnorsWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Noffke v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1967

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hughes v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1981
  2. Walker v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Livingston v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
  4. Reid v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1988
  5. State v. HalmoCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API