Legal Opinion

Columbus Sewer Pipe Co. v. Ganser

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 4, 1885PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Error to Bay. (Green, J.) Assumpsit. Defendants bring error. "Where the time for which a bond is to run is uncertain the courts construe it to be a reasonable time: Crémor v. ILigginson 1 Mas. 335 ; White v. Reed 15 Conn. 457; parol testimony is admissible to apply the instrument to the subject matter: Coleman v. Post 10 Mich. 422; Bennett v. Baidler 16 Mich. 150; Bowlter v. Johnson 17 Mich. 42; Kimiball v. Myers 21 Mich. 276; Ilyler v. Nolan 45 Mich. 357; Lee v. Wisner 38…

Read the full summary

Error to Bay. (Green, J.) Assumpsit. Defendants bring error. "Where the time for which a bond is to run is uncertain the courts construe it to be a reasonable time: Crémor v. ILigginson 1 Mas. 335 ; White v. Reed 15 Conn. 457; parol testimony is admissible to apply the instrument to the subject matter: Coleman v. Post 10 Mich. 422; Bennett v. Baidler 16 Mich. 150; Bowlter v. Johnson 17 Mich. 42; Kimiball v. Myers 21 Mich. 276; Ilyler v. Nolan 45 Mich. 357; Lee v. Wisner 38 Mich. 87 ; and contemplated circumstances may be shown: White Sevoing Macli. Co. v. Mullins 41 Mich. 341; notice to an…

1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, J.

This is an action, of assumpsit brought by plaintiff to recover an amount claimed to be due to the company upon a certain bond executed by defendants to the plaintiff, on the 24th day of May, 1882, in which defendants Brunner and Cusson were sureties, the bond being a mercantile guaranty to secure to the plaintiff the purchase price of 6ewer-pipe purchased by defendant Ganser, and which reads as follows:

“ Know all men by these presents, that we, August Ganser, Joseph Cusson and Charles Brunner, of Bay City, and Bay county, Michigan, are held and firmly bound unto’the Columbus Sewer-pipe…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gard v. StevensMichigan Supreme Court · 1864
  2. Crittenden v. FiskeMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Jeudevine v. RoseMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Dustin & Musick v. HodgenIllinois Supreme Court · 1868
  5. Lombard v. FiskeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1844

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Bedford v. KelleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Bandit Industries, Inc. v. Hobbs International, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Borden v. Fletcher's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Nichols v. SeaksMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Home Savings Bank v. HosieMichigan Supreme Court · 1898

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API